This is the second part of our review of Jim Collins book, How the Mighty Fall and we will examine the second stage he discovered in his research: 'The Undisciplined Pursuit of More.' Does his analysis match reality with the Southern Baptist Convention. I believe it does. One of Collins's markers for this stage is "unsustainable quest for growth, confusing big with great.'
The Second World War was the impetus for a great population migration. People moved to find jobs to support the war effort. They moved from the farm to the city, they moved from the south to the north, from the east to the west wherever the war took them. This led to an enormous increase in the number of Southern Baptist churches. New churches sprang up where Southern Baptist had never be before: California, Ohio, and other states in the mideast and midwest. This was a good thing. However many of those churches were the mirror image of their home churches in south. Most of the members were displaced southerners. It meant these churches would and some still do struggle. I remember when I graduated from seminary I got a letter from a church in Toledo, Ohio that began this way, "We noticed your wife is a nurse...." In other words come to our church and serve for free. I know there are people in Toledo who need Jesus but starting dozens of churches that will constantly struggle and always do so is not the answer. The sheer quest for more led to bad strategic decisions.
To support the postwar expansion the SBC created three new seminaries in the 1950s: Golden Gate in northern California; Midwestern Seminary in Kansas City and Southeastern in North Carolina. That was an expensive decision that committed millions of bucks to buildings and infrastructure. It was also an attempt to replicate a church culture that worked fine in the south but not elsewhere. Perhaps a better strategy would have been to negotiate and establish a 'House of Southern Baptist Studies at Gordon-Conwell (Boston); Conservative Bapt Seminary (Denver) and Western Seminary (Portland). This would have speeded up the process of raising up indigenous leadership. NAMB's Strategic Focus Cities is a step in the right direction. Wish it had happened fifty years ago.
Finally, our unquenchable thirst for more led to some faulty evangelism training. In the last 30 years we used EE, then CWT which we ripped off from James Kennedy, and lately FAITH. If there's a letter in the alphabet related to evangelsim training I've had it. That's good but it's only good when it becomes our story. The main problem with our evangelism in the last thirty years is that its focus has been on the decision side rather than the disciple-making side. Conversion is not the end, it just the beginning. It should be reflected in how we share the good news.
Johnny Hunt is right: a Great Commission Resurgence must be personal; it must begin with us. Then we can make smart, strategic decisions as a denomination and fulfill the Great Commission.